Ask A Rapist Thread Reddit -
While Reddit’s moderation team is swift to remove overtly violent content in 2024, archived versions of these threads (via sites like removeddit or reveddit) reveal a disturbing pattern. The hypothetical thread usually begins with a provocative prompt on a subreddit known for "No Stupid Questions" or "AMA" (Ask Me Anything) formats:
"Throwaway account for obvious reasons. I am a convicted rapist who served 8 years. I have been out for 3. I have done extensive therapy. AMA."
Alternatively, the darker versions appear on less moderated subreddrafts:
"Current predator here. I have assaulted multiple people and never been caught. Ask me why I do it."
The responses from the OP (Original Poster) range from clinically detached to disturbingly boastful. Common themes include:
Generally, no. The First Amendment (in the US) protects speech that is merely "repugnant." However, if a commenter asks "How can I do what you did?" and the OP provides instructions, that crosses into criminal solicitation or aiding and abetting.
Furthermore, these threads interfere with active investigations. If a victim is reading a confession that matches their assault (same date, location, or method), the thread can be subpoenaed. Reddit has released IP logs in response to federal warrants in the past, turning an anonymous "Ask A Rapist" thread into a direct line to a defense attorney.
A darker evolution of the "Ask a Rapist" format occurred in now-banned subreddits like r/Incels and r/Braincels. In these spaces, users did not ask "Why did you do it?" but rather "How can I do it too?"
These threads blended "rape advocacy" with "seduction community" pseudoscience. Questions included:
These are not academic inquiries. They are blueprints. Reddit’s 2020 content policy update explicitly banned "promotion of sexual violence," leading to the quarantine and eventual ban of these communities. However, the threads often resurface on alternative platforms like SaidIt or Telegram.
The "Ask a Rapist" thread, posted in July 2012 on the r/AskReddit subreddit, remains one of the most controversial events in Reddit's history. It began when a user asked redditors "from the other side of the story" about their motivations and whether they felt regret. Overview of the Incident
Scale and Content: The thread rapidly gained traction, amassing over 12,000 comments. It included dozens of firsthand accounts from self-admitted perpetrators describing various forms of sexual assault.
Moderation Action: After significant backlash from users and victims' rights advocates, Reddit moderators eventually "nuked" (deleted) the thread, citing it as an insult to victims and a platform for "personal conquest stories". Critical Perspectives
The thread sparked a massive debate regarding the ethics of such discussions on public platforms:
Platforming Harm: Critics argued the thread provided rapists with a platform to "craft narratives" that justified their actions, often blaming victims or claiming biological inevitability (e.g., the harmful phrase "an erect dick has no conscience"). This was seen as a way for perpetrators to achieve a sense of catharsis without taking real responsibility.
Re-traumatization: Many users, particularly survivors, found the thread extremely distressing and harmful, noting that it forced them to see the world from the perspective of people who had harmed them.
Psychological Insight: Conversely, some argued that the thread provided a rare, "chilling" look into the psychology of sexual assault. Proponents felt it was a "thought-provoking" reminder that perpetrators are often ordinary people—friends, colleagues, or spouses—rather than stereotypical "monsters" in the shadows. Academic and Research Impact
Despite its deletion, the thread became a subject of serious academic study.
The Study: Researchers analyzed approximately 68 of the firsthand accounts to identify recurring themes in the minds of perpetrators.
Key Findings: The analysis identified several major themes, including Sexual Scripts (justifying sex as a male right), Victim Blaming (claiming the victim drank too much or didn't say "no" enough), and Hostile Sexism.
Policy & Prevention: These findings have been used to help shape sexual assault prevention curriculum by addressing and circumventing the justifications perpetrators use to minimize their harm. The 'ask a rapist' thread : r/MuseumOfReddit
The "Ask a Rapist" thread remains one of the most controversial and widely discussed moments in Reddit's history. Posted in 2012 on the subreddit r/AskReddit, the thread invited individuals who had committed sexual assault to share their stories from their own perspectives.
What followed was a firestorm of ethical debate, a massive surge in traffic, and a lasting impact on how digital platforms moderate sensitive content. The Origin of the Thread
The thread began with a seemingly straightforward, albeit provocative, prompt: "Rapists of Reddit, what is your side of the story?" The user who posted it claimed they wanted to understand the psychology behind the act and whether the perpetrators felt guilt or justified their actions.
Within hours, the post exploded. It garnered thousands of comments, including many from individuals who admitted to various degrees of sexual misconduct and assault. Some commenters expressed remorse, while others used the platform to rationalize their behavior or blame their victims. The Immediate Controversy
The backlash was instantaneous and intense. Critics argued that the thread:
Re-traumatized Survivors: Victims of sexual assault scrolling through Reddit were suddenly confronted with detailed, first-person accounts of the very crimes committed against them.
Provided a Platform for Predators: Many felt that giving perpetrators a space to "tell their side" served to humanize horrific acts and allowed for a dangerous level of "victim-blaming" narrative construction.
Lacked Professional Oversight: Unlike a clinical study or a police interview, this was a public forum without any psychological safeguards or moderation geared toward victim safety.
On the other side, some argued that the thread provided a rare, unfiltered look into the mind of offenders, which could theoretically be used for educational or preventative purposes. However, this academic curiosity was largely overshadowed by the sheer toxicity of the content. Reddit’s Response and the Aftermath
As the thread grew, the moderation team of r/AskReddit struggled to manage the influx of reports. Eventually, the thread was deleted. Reddit’s leadership at the time faced heavy criticism for allowing the post to stay up as long as it did, especially as it began to attract mainstream media attention from outlets like Gawker and The Huffington Post.
The incident became a turning point for Reddit’s Content Policy. It highlighted the "Wild West" nature of the site’s early years and forced the administration to reconsider the boundaries of "free speech" versus "community safety." Lasting Impact on Digital Ethics
The "Ask a Rapist" thread is frequently cited in studies regarding internet sociology and digital ethics. It serves as a primary example of "toxic curiosity"—the desire to peek into the darkest corners of humanity without considering the collateral damage to vulnerable populations.
Today, such a thread would likely be flagged and removed within minutes under modern safety guidelines. Most major subreddits now have strict rules against content that glorifies, encourages, or provides a platform for the confession of violent crimes. Conclusion
The legacy of the "Ask a Rapist" thread is not one of psychological breakthrough, but of a platform failing to protect its users. It remains a stark reminder of the responsibilities that come with hosting massive, anonymous communities and the thin line between open dialogue and the enablement of harm.
The "Ask a Rapist" thread on Reddit is a controversial topic. I'll provide a neutral guide on how to approach this subject.
What is the "Ask a Rapist" thread?
The "Ask a Rapist" thread was a Reddit discussion that emerged, where individuals who identified as rapists or claimed to have committed rape shared their experiences and perspectives. The thread sparked intense debate and criticism, with many accusing Reddit of allowing a platform for perpetrators to justify or glorify their actions.
Why was the thread created?
The thread's creator claimed it was an attempt to understand the mindset and behaviors of rapists, with the goal of preventing future instances of rape. However, many critics argued that the thread was misguided, potentially harmful, and disregarded the experiences of survivors.
Key concerns and criticisms:
How to approach this topic:
If you're interested in understanding the complexities of rape and perpetrator behavior:
When engaging with online discussions, prioritize respectful and informed conversations. Be cautious of threads that might perpetuate harm or trivialized discussions of rape. Ask A Rapist Thread Reddit
If you or someone you know has been affected by sexual violence, there are resources available to help:
Would you like more information on resources or support services?
Title: Understanding and Navigating the Complexities of the "Ask a Rapist" Thread on Reddit
The "Ask a Rapist" thread on Reddit has sparked intense debate and discussion since its creation. The thread, where individuals who have committed rape or identify as rapists share their perspectives and answer questions from users, raises important questions about the nature of sexual violence, accountability, and the role of online communities in addressing these issues.
The Purpose of the Thread
Proponents of the thread argue that it provides a unique opportunity for users to engage with individuals who have committed serious crimes, gaining insight into their thoughts, motivations, and behaviors. By doing so, the thread aims to:
The Limitations and Concerns
Despite its potential benefits, the "Ask a Rapist" thread has raised several concerns:
Navigating the Complexities
To engage with the "Ask a Rapist" thread in a responsible and respectful manner:
By engaging with the complexities of the "Ask a Rapist" thread in a thoughtful and considerate manner, users can foster a deeper understanding of the issues surrounding sexual violence, promote empathy and critical thinking, and contribute to a more nuanced and informed discussion.
"Ask a Rapist" thread is one of the most controversial events in Reddit's history, later archived by the Museum of Reddit
. Originally intended to gain insight into the motivations and self-justifications of perpetrators, it was eventually deleted by moderators due to the massive volume of disturbing content and its potential to re-traumatize victims.
If you are looking to explore the legacy of this thread or its sociological impact, here are the core "features" and insights it produced: 1. Academic & Sociological Research
Despite its deletion, the thread became a data source for researchers. Self-Justification Study
: Sociologists and psychologists used the archived comments to study how perpetrators rationalize their actions. The "Non-Recognition" Gap
: A key finding was that a high percentage of participants did not recognize their behavior as rape, despite it meeting the legal definition. 2. Community & Survivor Impact
The thread sparked an intense debate about platform safety and the ethics of giving a voice to criminals. Secondary Trauma : Many users in subreddits like
What was the "Ask a Rapist" thread?
The "Ask a Rapist" thread was a Reddit discussion that allowed users to ask questions to individuals who had committed rape or identified themselves as rapists. The thread was created with the intention of providing a space for people to understand the mindset and behaviors of rapists.
Purpose and goals
The purpose of the thread was to facilitate an open and honest discussion about rape and sexual violence. The moderators of the thread aimed to create a safe space for users to ask questions and receive answers from individuals who had committed rape.
Controversy and criticism
The thread sparked intense controversy and criticism from many users and outside observers. Some of the concerns raised included:
Reddit's response
Reddit administrators eventually shut down the thread, citing concerns about the potential harm it could cause to users. The platform's policies prohibit content that promotes or glorifies violence, harassment, or hate speech.
Key takeaways
The "Ask a Rapist" thread on Reddit highlights the complexities and challenges of discussing sensitive topics online. While the thread's intention may have been to facilitate an open and honest discussion, it ultimately sparked controversy and concern.
Some key takeaways from this incident include:
Overall, the "Ask a Rapist" thread serves as a reminder of the importance of thoughtful and responsible online discourse.
The "Ask a Rapist" thread on Reddit is a thought-provoking and highly controversial topic that has sparked intense discussions and debates on the platform. The thread, which was created in 2013, aimed to provide a space for users to ask questions to individuals who have committed rape or other forms of sexual violence.
The thread was initially created as a research project by a group of researchers who wanted to understand the motivations and behaviors of individuals who have committed sexual violence. The researchers aimed to gather data and insights from the perpetrators themselves, which could potentially help in the development of prevention strategies and interventions.
However, the thread quickly gained attention and sparked a heated debate among Reddit users, with some arguing that it was a valuable resource for understanding the minds of perpetrators, while others claimed that it was insensitive and potentially harmful to survivors of sexual violence.
The Purpose of the Thread
The primary goal of the "Ask a Rapist" thread was to provide a platform for researchers to gather data and insights from individuals who have committed sexual violence. The researchers aimed to understand the motivations, behaviors, and thought processes of these individuals, which could potentially help in the development of prevention strategies and interventions.
The thread was designed to be an anonymous and safe space for participants to share their experiences and thoughts. The researchers ensured that the participants' identities were protected, and their responses were kept confidential.
The Controversy Surrounding the Thread
The "Ask a Rapist" thread quickly gained attention on Reddit, with many users expressing their concerns and outrage. Some argued that the thread was insensitive and potentially harmful to survivors of sexual violence, who may be triggered or re-traumatized by the discussion.
Others claimed that the thread was a form of "armchair psychology" and that it was not a legitimate or effective way to understand the complex issues surrounding sexual violence. Some critics also argued that the thread could potentially attract individuals who are not genuine perpetrators but rather are seeking attention or notoriety.
The Reddit Community's Response
The Reddit community was divided on the issue, with some users defending the thread as a valuable resource for understanding the minds of perpetrators, while others vehemently opposed it.
Some users argued that the thread was a necessary evil, as it provided a unique opportunity to gather data and insights from individuals who have committed sexual violence. They claimed that this information could potentially help in the development of prevention strategies and interventions.
Others, however, were strongly opposed to the thread, arguing that it was insensitive and potentially harmful to survivors of sexual violence. They claimed that the thread trivialized or normalized sexual violence and that it was not an effective way to address the complex issues surrounding the topic. While Reddit’s moderation team is swift to remove
The Impact on Survivors and the Community
The "Ask a Rapist" thread had a significant impact on survivors of sexual violence and the wider community. Many survivors reported feeling triggered or re-traumatized by the discussion, and some expressed their concerns about the potential harm that the thread could cause.
The thread also sparked a wider conversation about sexual violence and the importance of supporting survivors. Many users and organizations spoke out against the thread, highlighting the need for sensitivity and compassion when discussing issues related to sexual violence.
The Legacy of the Thread
The "Ask a Rapist" thread has left a lasting legacy on Reddit and the wider online community. While the thread itself is no longer active, it continues to be remembered as a pivotal moment in the conversation about sexual violence and online discourse.
The thread highlighted the complexities and challenges of discussing sensitive topics online and the need for sensitivity and compassion when engaging with issues related to trauma and violence.
Conclusion
The "Ask a Rapist" thread on Reddit was a highly controversial and thought-provoking topic that sparked intense discussions and debates. While the thread was designed to provide a platform for researchers to gather data and insights from individuals who have committed sexual violence, it ultimately became a focal point for concerns about sensitivity, compassion, and the impact on survivors.
The legacy of the thread serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of discussing sensitive topics online and the need for ongoing conversations about how to engage with issues related to trauma and violence in a way that is respectful, compassionate, and supportive of survivors.
The "Ask a Rapist" thread is one of the most infamous and controversial events in Reddit's history
. Originating in July 2012 on the r/AskReddit subreddit, it began with a prompt asking for "the other side of the story" from perpetrators of sexual assault. Timeline and Event Overview Origin (July 2012):
A user posted the question: "Reddit's had a few threads about sexual assault victims, but are there any redditors from the other side of the story? What were your motivations? Do you regret it?". Viral Growth:
The thread quickly gained thousands of comments, featuring graphic first-person accounts of sexual assault.
Due to intense public outcry and concerns that it provided a platform for perpetrators to brag about or justify their crimes, the thread was eventually "nuked" (completely deleted) by
The July 2012 "Ask a Rapist" Reddit thread, which generated over 12,000 comments before being deleted, sparked intense public outcry and became a subject of academic study regarding perpetrator justifications. A study published in Psychology of Violence analyzed 68 accounts from the thread, identifying themes of sexual scripts, victim-blaming, and hostile sexism as common justifications. For more details, visit The Independent. The 'ask a rapist' thread : r/MuseumOfReddit
The "Ask A Rapist Thread" on Reddit: Understanding the Controversy and Its Implications
The "Ask A Rapist Thread" on Reddit sparked intense debate and controversy upon its creation. This thread, which allowed users to anonymously ask questions to individuals who have committed rape, was met with widespread criticism and concern. In this blog post, we'll delve into the thread's concept, the backlash it received, and the implications of such a platform.
What was the "Ask A Rapist Thread"?
The "Ask A Rapist Thread" was a Reddit thread that emerged, where users could ask questions to individuals who had admitted to committing rape. The thread's creators claimed that it aimed to provide a platform for people to understand the minds of rapists and gain insight into their thought processes.
The Backlash
The thread quickly gained attention, and the reaction was overwhelmingly negative. Many critics argued that the thread:
Implications and Concerns
The "Ask A Rapist Thread" raises several concerns:
Conclusion
The "Ask A Rapist Thread" on Reddit serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges surrounding online discourse, particularly when it comes to sensitive topics like rape and violence. While the thread's intentions may have been to provide insight and understanding, its execution was widely criticized, and its implications are still being felt.
In the aftermath of the controversy, consider:
The "Ask A Rapist" thread is one of the most controversial and infamous events in Reddit's history. Originating in July 2012 on the r/AskReddit subreddit, the post invited self-identified sexual offenders to share their motivations and whether they felt remorse. Overview of the Thread
Initial Intent: The thread was started by a user who noted that while there were many threads for victims, there were few asking for the "other side of the story". Scale: It quickly amassed over 12,000 comments.
Content: Responses included graphic descriptions of sexual assault. Many users used the platform to justify their actions or blame their victims. Backlash and Removal
The thread was widely condemned for providing a "consequence-free catharsis" for criminals and for the "rape apology" found in many of the top-voted comments.
Psychological Warning: Psychologists warned that the thread was dangerous, as it allowed rapists to relive their crimes for pleasure and potentially emboldened others.
"Nuked" by Moderators: After massive media attention and internal outcry, moderators "nuked" the thread, deleting the post and all its comments to prevent further harm and potential doxxing. Scientific Research Findings
In 2015, researchers from Georgia State University published a study in the journal Psychology of Violence using archived data from the thread to analyze the self-justifications of rapists. Key themes identified include:
Sexual Scripts (37%): Narratives about how men are "supposed" to initiate sex and the false belief that "no" means "yes".
Victim Blaming (29%): Blaming the victim's intoxication, clothing, or perceived flirting.
Hostile Sexism (24%): Expressions of general hostility or disparagement toward women.
Biological Essentialism (18%): Claiming their actions were an uncontrollable biological need ("an erect dick has no conscience"). The 'ask a rapist' thread : r/MuseumOfReddit
Report on "Ask A Rapist" Thread on Reddit
Overview
The "Ask A Rapist" thread refers to a specific discussion that took place on the social media platform Reddit. While there have been various iterations over the years, the most notorious instance occurred in the subreddit r/AskReddit. The thread invited individuals who had committed sexual assault or rape to share their perspectives and motivations.
Key Details
The Shut Down and Rationale
The thread was eventually removed by Reddit administrators. This action was not taken merely because the content was offensive, but due to specific research regarding the impact of such discussions.
The Role of Dr. Anna Salter's Research
Reddit administrators cited the work of Dr. Anna Salter, a psychologist and expert on sex offenders, specifically her book Transforming Trauma: A Guide to Understanding and Treating Adult Survivors. The decision to remove the thread was based on the concern that providing a platform for rapists to tell their stories could be damaging. These are not academic inquiries
Reasons for Removal:
Aftermath and Policy Changes
The removal of the "Ask A Rapist" thread was a pivotal moment in Reddit's history regarding content moderation. It signaled a shift in the site's approach to controversial content.
Conclusion
The "Ask A Rapist" thread serves as a case study in the ethics of content moderation. It highlighted the tension between open discourse and the responsibility of platforms to prevent harm. The decision to shut it down, influenced by psychological expertise, established a precedent that protecting vulnerable populations and preventing the promotion of sexual violence takes precedence over unrestricted freedom of speech in private digital spaces.
"Ask A Rapist" thread, posted on Reddit’s r/AskReddit in 2012, remains one of the most controversial and analyzed moments in the history of the platform. The thread sought to provide a space for offenders to share their perspectives and motivations, but it quickly devolved into a toxic environment that raised profound ethical questions about online moderation survivor trauma , and the limits of anonymous speech The Intent and the Reality
The original post was framed as a way to gain psychological insight into a crime that is often shrouded in silence. However, the result was far from clinical. Because Reddit’s voting system
rewards engagement, the most detailed and unrepentant stories were "upvoted" to the top. This effectively prioritized the voices of victimizers over victims, creating a platform that many argued re-traumatized survivors who stumbled upon the thread. Ethical Implications
The thread highlighted a massive failure in community management. While Reddit was then known for its "wild west" approach to free speech
, the "Ask A Rapist" thread demonstrated that total neutrality can lead to harm. Critics argued that the thread: Normalized sexual violence:
By giving offenders a "safe space" to explain their actions without immediate legal or social consequences. Lacked professional oversight:
Unlike a clinical study or a moderated support group, there were no mental health professionals or legal experts to frame the discussion. Cultural Aftermath
The backlash was significant. It sparked a broader conversation about platform accountability
and eventually led to stricter content policies on Reddit. It serves as a case study for how digital spaces can inadvertently become breeding grounds for harmful behavior when they prioritize engagement metrics over human safety.
In conclusion, while the thread was ostensibly an attempt at radical transparency, it ultimately served as a reminder that some topics require more than just an open forum—they require responsibility , and strict ethical boundaries on the readers or the policy changes Reddit implemented afterward?
I'll provide a comprehensive response to the topic.
The "Ask A Rapist" thread on Reddit sparked controversy and debate upon its creation. The thread aimed to provide a platform for users to ask questions to individuals who have committed rape, with the goal of understanding their thought processes, behaviors, and motivations.
Key Points:
The "Ask A Rapist" thread serves as a case study for the complexities of online discourse. Online discussions about sensitive topics requires careful consideration, robust moderation, and prioritizing safety and well-being.
The "Ask a Rapist" thread is one of the most infamous and controversial events in Reddit's history
. In July 2012, a user posted a prompt asking for "the other side of the story" from people who had committed sexual assault. The resulting thread became a chilling archive of thousands of comments where perpetrators used "interpretive lenses" to justify their actions.
This story explores the perspective of a researcher tasked with analyzing these archives, capturing the psychological weight and common themes found within the thread. The Archive of Shadows
The blue light of the monitor was the only thing illuminating the small office at Georgia State University. Dr. Aris sat motionless, her eyes scanning a digital graveyard that had been "nuked" from the public internet years ago, yet lived on in her database as a subject of clinical study.
Her task was to categorize the 68 first-hand accounts that had survived the initial filtering process. As she clicked through the files, a pattern began to emerge—not of monsters in the dark, but of ordinary men who had rewritten their own histories to avoid the title of "rapist". The Script of Justification
One account, written by a man who had assaulted a colleague, stood out for its clinical coldness. He didn’t use words like "force" or "fear." Instead, he spoke of "biological essentialism"—the idea that his needs were simply too loud to ignore. He described his victim as "dead weight," an object to be used rather than a person with a voice. Aris noted the recurring themes in her spreadsheet: Victim Blaming:
"She was teasing me," or "She didn't say no clearly enough". Sexual Scripts:
A belief that a woman's "no" was actually a part of a game, an invitation to be pursued. Sociosexuality:
A total lack of emotional connection, viewing the act as a transaction of power. The Echo of the Victims
Interspersed with the perpetrators’ "sob stories" were the haunting reflections of those who had stumbled upon the thread while it was still live. Aris found a comment from a survivor who described the physical nausea of realizing her own attacker might be on this very site, being "patted on the back" by hundreds of anonymous users for his "honesty". The Conclusion of a Dark Study
By the time the sun began to rise, Aris had finished her categorization. The thread wasn't a collection of "horror stories" from strangers in alleyways. It was a record of betrayal by friends, husbands, and acquaintances who felt entitled to someone else’s body. The 'ask a rapist' thread : r/MuseumOfReddit
"Ask a Rapist" thread is widely considered one of the most controversial and dark moments in the history of Reddit. Posted in July 2012 on the r/AskReddit subreddit, the thread invited perpetrators of sexual assault to share their stories, motivations, and whether they felt regret. Origin and Intent
The thread began when a user noted that while there were many threads for victims, there were none for the "other side of the story". It quickly went viral, generating over 13,000 responses
within a short period. While some hoped the thread would provide psychological insight, it primarily became a platform for unfiltered admissions of assault. The Controversy The thread faced immense backlash for several reasons: Rape Apology and Validation:
Many commenters began "pating on the back" or reassuring perpetrators, framing their actions as mistakes rather than crimes. Victim Blaming:
A significant portion of the responses blamed victims for drinking, flirting, or not resisting enough. Self-Justification:
Perpetrators frequently used "sexual scripts" to justify their actions, such as the idea that an "erect dick has no conscience" or that a woman's "no" actually meant "yes". Survivor Trauma:
Many survivors on the platform expressed horror and nausea at the thought that their own rapists could be using the thread to find catharsis without consequence. Psychological and Academic Impact
Despite the controversy, the thread became a rare data source for researchers at Georgia State University . Their study, published in the journal Psychology of Violence
, analyzed a subset of 68 first-hand accounts to identify common themes used by perpetrators to rationalize sexual violence. Key themes identified included: Sexual Scripts (37%):
Narratives about male desire and how men are "supposed" to initiate sex. Victim Blaming (29%):
Shifting responsibility to the victim's behavior or state of intoxication. Hostile Sexism (24%):
Comments disparaging toward women or dismissive of the assault. Biological Essentialism (18%):
Claiming they "couldn't help it" due to hormones or biology.
For genuine predators, anonymity removes the fear of consequence, leaving only the addiction to power. By describing their crimes to a horrified audience, they relive the control they exerted over their victim. When a commenter writes, "You are a monster," the predator reads it as, "You have successfully dominated my emotions." The "Ask A Rapist" thread becomes a voyeuristic stage for secondary abuse.
