David Irving - Hitler----s War-la Guerra De Hitler -castellano-.pdf May 2026

Hitler’s War was intended as the first volume in a planned biographical trilogy about Hitler. Unlike conventional histories that focus on Nazi crimes, Irving’s book attempts to view the war exclusively from Hitler’s perspective. The thesis: Hitler was a brilliant, albeit flawed, military strategist who was betrayed by his generals and kept in the dark about the worst atrocities of the regime.

In the Spanish edition, La guerra de Hitler, Irving’s preface often includes disclaimers that he is not a Nazi sympathizer—claims that the London court later deemed deceptive. The book covers major military campaigns (Poland, France, Stalingrad, D-Day, the Battle of the Bulge) while systematically omitting or reinterpreting evidence of the Holocaust, Einsatzgruppen massacres, and Hitler’s direct orders for genocide. Hitler’s War was intended as the first volume

If you read Spanish and want a serious, evidence-based account of Hitler’s role in the war and Holocaust, consider these works instead of Irving’s PDF: In the Spanish edition, La guerra de Hitler

David Irving was once considered a formidable, if unorthodox, military historian. Unlike many academics who researched in libraries, Irving was known for his "shoe-leather" research. He traveled across Europe digging through archives, interviewing former members of the Nazi elite (including secretaries, adjutants, and generals), and unearthing diaries that had been lost or overlooked. Unlike many academics who researched in libraries, Irving

In the 1970s, he published Hitler’s War. The title itself was a statement of intent: it viewed the Second World War entirely through the lens of Adolf Hitler’s perspective. Irving wanted to describe the war "as Hitler saw it," minute by minute, from the bunker to the battlefield.

Distributing or downloading David Irving’s PDFs may be legal in some countries (free speech protections in the US, for example), but in Germany, Austria, France, Poland, and Spain, Holocaust denial is a criminal offense. Furthermore, sharing Irving’s work supports an author who has served prison time in Austria for denying the Holocaust (2006). Ethically, historians urge readers to treat his books as primary sources of denialism, not as trustworthy secondary sources.