$109.44
In Stock
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS:
Minimum: PC Intel i3 or i5 or Ryzen 3, 4 GB RAM, Windows 8.1 (32- or 64-Bit), DirectX11, graphic card with 512 MB RAM, DVD-ROM drive (not required in download version), Windows Media Player and Internet access. Recommended: PC Intel i7, i9 or Ryzen 7/9, 8 GB RAM, Windows 11 or 10 with 64-Bit, Windows Media Player, graphic card with 1 GB RAM, RTX graphic card for real time Raytrace board, DVD-ROM drive and Internet access. For ChessBase ACCOUNT: Internet access and up-to-date browser, e.g. Chrome, Safari. Runs on Windows, OS X, iOS, Android and Linux!
| Aspect | What Worked | What Fell Short | |--------|-------------|-----------------| | Location Shooting | Filmed on location in Kenya’s Maasai Mara, the lush vistas give the movie an authentic, breath‑taking backdrop. | Frequent rain delays led to continuity errors—some jungle scenes show noticeably different foliage. | | Practical Effects | The animatronic orangutan used for Tarzan’s adoptive “father” is impressively lifelike for its time. | The climactic vine‑swing chase relied on obvious wires, breaking immersion for modern viewers. | | Score | Composer Laura Whitaker blends tribal percussion with a subtle orchestral undertone, creating a tension that mirrors Jane’s inner turmoil. | A few chase scenes resort to generic “action” synth motifs that feel dated. | | Costume Design | Jane’s wardrobe—practical field gear mixed with period‑appropriate Victorian touches—reinforces her dual identity as a scientist and a lady of the era. | Tarzan’s outfit, while iconic, is made of cheap faux‑leather that looks artificial up close. |
The 1995 film you might be referring to could be "Tarzan & the Call of the Wild," an animated film that aired on CBS, though detailed records might confuse it with "Tarzan and Jane" (which could relate to the 1995 film "Tarzan & Jane," an animated television film).
In cinematic adaptations, the portrayal of Tarzan and Jane has evolved significantly. From the early films that somewhat stereotypically depicted their romance, to more modern adaptations that offer complex portrayals of their characters and their relationships.
Jane had always thought of the jungle as a place that revealed truth by stripping away artifice. Now, with Tarzan standing between her and the encroaching civilization she once called salvation, she watched the very definition of truth bend.
He wore the forest like a second skin: every scar a sentence, every silence a grammar she couldn’t parse. Civilization had taught Jane to name things—chairs, calendars, promises—but here names frayed at the edges. Tarzan spoke in gestures and sudden, feral logic; his tenderness was a lawless geography she could neither map nor domesticate. Shame, she realized, was not the blush of wrongdoing but the ache of encountering a version of herself that didn’t fit the only story she’d ever told.
When the telegraph wires hummed through the canopy and the men in pressed collars measured the forest with rulers, Jane felt a different kind of exile: not from home, but from the identity that had sustained her. The men called her civilized; Tarzan called her alone. Between those names she spun, like a moth caught in two lamps, and wondered which light would burn her clearer.
In the hush before dawn, as mist unstitched the treetops and the world held its breath, Jane’s shame did not announce itself with guilt but with clarity. She saw the compromises that had sewn her life together—comforts accepted, truths shelved—and heard, beneath the jungle’s primeval chorus, the faint insistence of a life unlived. Choosing Tarzan would be an admission, not of sin, but of a radical unmaking: a decision to trade certainty for the jagged honesty of the wild.
She reached for his hand not because it promised rescue, but because it offered a language she’d been starved for—a vocabulary of risk, of blunt, unschooled loyalty. Shame softened into something like resolve. If shame is the mirror that forces you to see yourself whole, then she would step through it, into an uncharted world where identities were not declared but lived, day by precarious day.
Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (also known as Tharzan - La vera storia del figlio della giungla
) is a 1995 adult film directed by Joe D'Amato. Unlike typical low-budget productions of its genre, it is often noted for its high production values, including on-location filming in Kenya and the use of cinematic film stock. Critical Overview
Reviews generally highlight the film’s blend of standard adult content with a surprisingly "romantic" or "cinematic" feel for the genre. Cinematography & Atmosphere: Reviewers on Letterboxd
point out that the film looks significantly better than its peers, with "stunning photography" and "panavision-style" shots. Performances: The chemistry between the leads— Rocco Siffredi (Tarzan) and Rosa Caracciolo
(Jane)—is frequently cited as a high point, with some calling it the most "faithful" rendition of the Tarzan and Jane dynamic within an adult context. Plot & Pacing:
While it follows the classic Edgar Rice Burroughs premise of Jane discovering an "Ape-man," critics note the dialogue can be "awkward" or "unintentional comedy," such as Jane attempting to explain human anatomy to Tarzan. Content & Rating Hardcore adult adventure. Key Scenes:
Features extensive erotic sequences, often intercut with footage of African wildlife (like monkeys watching from trees). Parental Warning:
The film contains explicit sexual content and is not intended for general audiences. Letterboxd
If you are looking for a non-adult adaptation from that era, you might be interested in the 1999 Disney animated or the 1998 live-action Tarzan and the Lost City classic adventure adaptations of Tarzan, or are you interested in other cult cinema from director Joe D'Amato? Tarzan - Shame of Jane (1995) - IMDb
It’s a common mix-up in the world of cult cinema: searching for "Tarzan: Shame of Jane (1995)" often leads down a rabbit hole of parody films, jungle adventure tropes, and the specific era of 90s direct-to-video releases. If you are looking for the "full" story behind this title, The Origins: A Jungle Parody
First things first—this is not a Disney movie. While 1995 was a peak year for jungle-themed media, Tarzan: Shame of Jane is a specialized parody. It was produced during an era when adult-oriented parodies of mainstream characters (like Tarzan, James Bond, or Sherlock Holmes) were a massive industry in the home video market. Plot and Premise
The film follows the classic skeleton of Edgar Rice Burroughs' original tale but with a satirical, adult-leaning twist.
The Setting: A stylized, low-budget version of the African jungle.
The Conflict: Jane Porter arrives in the jungle, but instead of the refined Victorian lady we see in the novels, this version focuses on her "shameful" transition from civilization to the wild. tarzan shame of jane 1995 full
The Aesthetic: Like many 1995 independent features, it relies heavily on "camp" value—exaggerated acting, questionable loincloths, and a soundtrack that screams mid-90s synthesizers. Why the 1995 Date Matters
The mid-90s were a transformative time for the Tarzan franchise.
Public Domain Confusion: Because the character of Tarzan was entering various stages of public domain and licensing shifts, many independent studios rushed to create their own versions.
The Pre-Disney Wave: This film actually predates the famous 1999 Disney animated Tarzan. In 1995, the most "current" mainstream Tarzan was often found in TV syndication (like Tarzan: The Epic Adventures), leaving a gap in the market for edgier or stranger interpretations. Cult Legacy and Availability
Today, "Tarzan: Shame of Jane" is mostly discussed by collectors of "B-movies" and film historians interested in the history of adult parodies. It is rarely found on mainstream streaming services like Netflix or Max due to its niche nature and licensing origins.
Most people seeking the "full" version today find it through vintage VHS collectors or specialized archive sites that track the history of 90s cult cinema. A Note on Modern Viewing
If you are actually looking for a classic, family-friendly Tarzan experience from that era, you might be thinking of: Tarzan (1999): The definitive Disney version.
Tarzan and the Lost City (1998): A big-budget live-action attempt starring Casper Van Dien. Tarzan: The Epic Adventures (1996): The gritty TV series.
Tarzan: Shame of Jane remains a time capsule of 1995—a reminder of a time when the "Jungle King" could be reimagined in just about any way a low-budget studio saw fit.
Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995), directed by Joe D'Amato and starring Rocco Siffredi and Rosa Caracciolo, is an Italian adult adventure film noted for its high production values and location filming in Kenya. The plot follows a classic retelling that transitions into a culture shock narrative when Jane brings the Apeman to Britain, navigating a failed lawsuit from the Edgar Rice Burroughs estate. Find more information and user reviews on Tarzan - Shame of Jane (1995) - IMDb
Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane is a 1995 adult film directed by Joe D'Amato. It is notably known for being one of the more high-profile parody versions of the classic Tarzan story released during that era. Key Details Release Year: Joe D'Amato Rocco Siffredi as Tarzan and Rosa Caracciolo as Jane
The film follows Jane Porter as she returns to the jungle to find Tarzan, only to encounter various erotic complications and "charms" of the wild. Content Information Originally produced as an
adult feature, though some international releases were edited into softcore cuts. Viewers on sites like Letterboxd
often highlight its high production values for the genre and its campy dialogue. Full Version Availability:
As it is an adult film, the "full" or unrated version is typically found through specialized adult media retailers or archive platforms rather than mainstream streaming services.
Given the likely confusion, let's focus on creating a deep content based on the character and themes commonly associated with Tarzan and Jane:
“Tarzan: The Shame of Jane” may lack the polish of big‑budget blockbusters, but its heart beats with a sincerity that transcends its era. It offers a rare 90s lens on a timeless story, daring to ask uncomfortable questions about honor, exploitation, and the cost of progress. Whether you’re a die‑hard Tarzan fan, a student of film history, or simply someone who loves a good jungle romp, the movie is worth a watch—and a conversation.
Ready to dive back into the canopy? Grab a copy (the 1995 DVD is still in circulation on secondary markets) or stream the restored version on RetroFlix. Then, let us know in the comments: What does “shame” mean to you in the context of adventure stories?
If you enjoyed this deep‑dive, subscribe for more retro‑film analyses, behind‑the‑scenes looks, and modern takes on classic literature adaptations.
References & Further Reading
(All images used are either public domain or licensed under Creative Commons.) | Aspect | What Worked | What Fell
The 1995 film "Tarzan & Jane" isn't exactly what you're referring to, but I think you might be thinking of a different title: "Tarzan and Jane" or perhaps a parody/spoof. However, I found that "Tarzan: The Shame of Jane" isn't a well-known title.
If you're referring to the 1995 film "Tarzan and Jane" or a similar title, here's some information:
The most well-known film with a similar title is probably "Tarzan & Jane" (also known as "Tarzan and Jane"), but it was released in 2002, not 1995.
However, there was a film titled "Tarzan: The Shame of Jane" but I couldn't find any information about it being released in 1995.
If you could provide more information or context about the film you're referring to, I'd be happy to try and help you further.
Some possible films with similar titles include:
Tarzan & Jane (2002) - A Review
The Disney franchise of Tarzan has been a beloved one, captivating audiences with its thrilling adventures, memorable characters, and catchy music. In 2002, Disney released a direct-to-video sequel, "Tarzan & Jane," which revisited the iconic characters in a new and exciting way. The film was a commercial success and received generally positive reviews from critics. This essay will explore the film's themes, characters, and music, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses.
The Story
The film takes place one year after the events of the original Tarzan film. Tarzan (Tony Goldwyn) and Jane (Minnie Driver) are living together in the jungle, enjoying a romantic and peaceful life. However, their tranquility is disrupted by the arrival of a new villain, Captain Blake (Malcolm McDowell), a ruthless and cunning explorer who seeks to capture Tarzan and exploit the jungle's resources. Meanwhile, Jane struggles with her own identity, feeling torn between her love for Tarzan and her desire to reconnect with her past life in England.
Characters and Themes
The film's characters are well-developed and complex, with Tarzan and Jane's relationship being the emotional core of the story. Their love is put to the test as they face challenges and obstacles that threaten to tear them apart. Jane, in particular, undergoes significant character growth, assert her independence and individuality. The villain, Captain Blake, serves as a foil to Tarzan, highlighting their opposing values and worldviews.
The film explores themes of identity, love, and belonging, all of which are relevant to the Tarzan franchise. The movie also touches on the idea of cultural clashes, as Tarzan and Jane navigate their different backgrounds and perspectives. However, these themes are not fully developed, and the film sometimes relies on convenient plot devices and character arcs.
Music
The music in "Tarzan & Jane" is one of its strongest aspects. The film features a range of catchy and memorable songs, including "Love Will See Us Through" and "In Love," which are both stylish and fun. The score, composed by Phil Harris and Michael Torke, blends African rhythms and orchestral elements, creating a rich and immersive sound.
Conclusion
"Tarzan & Jane" (2002) is a fun and engaging film that offers a fresh take on the Tarzan franchise. While it may not be as groundbreaking as the original, it is a worthy sequel that explores themes of love, identity, and belonging. The film's characters, music, and action sequences make it an enjoyable watch, even if it doesn't quite live up to the standards set by its predecessor. Overall, "Tarzan & Jane" is a delightful addition to the Tarzan franchise, and its blend of adventure, romance, and music makes it a must-see for fans of the series.
References:
The 1990s marked a unique era for adult cinema, where high-budget parodies of mainstream blockbusters became a staple of the industry. Among the most infamous of these is the 1995 production, Tarzan: The Shame of Jane. This film took the legendary Edgar Rice Burroughs character and placed him in a provocative, adult-oriented narrative that remains a point of discussion for fans of vintage cult cinema. The Premise and Plot
Directed by Joe D'Amato, a prolific figure in Italian exploitation and adult film, Tarzan: The Shame of Jane reimagines the classic meeting between the feral King of the Jungle and the sophisticated Jane Parker. While the core elements of the Tarzan mythos—the jungle setting, the vine-swinging, and the communication barrier—are present, the film pivots quickly toward erotic themes.
The story follows Jane as she ventures into the African wilderness, only to encounter a primitive man of incredible strength. Unlike the Disney version or the classic Johnny Weissmuller films, this iteration focuses heavily on the primal, carnal awakening Jane experiences in the wild. Production Quality and Aesthetic The 1995 film you might be referring to
For a film of its genre and time, the production values were notably high.
Location Scouting: The film utilizes lush, tropical backdrops to simulate the African Congo.
Cinematography: D'Amato brought his experience from mainstream horror and erotica to give the film a polished, cinematic look.
Costuming: The wardrobe stays true to the "pulp fiction" roots of the characters, featuring the iconic loincloths and tattered Victorian expedition gear. Cult Legacy
Why does a film from 1995 still garner search interest today? The answer lies in the nostalgia for "Golden Age" adult parodies. Before the internet shifted the industry toward short-form content, films like The Shame of Jane were produced with actual scripts, soundtracks, and a focus on "feature-length" storytelling.
📍 Key Fact: Joe D’Amato often filmed multiple versions of his movies—one for the hardcore market and a "soft" version for international television distribution. Critical Reception
While it won't be found on any "Best of 1995" mainstream lists, within its niche, the film is often cited for the performance of its lead actress and its ability to capture the "jungle adventure" atmosphere. It represents a specific moment in pop culture where the lines between B-movie action and adult entertainment frequently blurred.
The Cult of : A Look Back at the 1995 " Shame of Jane When you hear the name "Tarzan," you probably think of Disney's animated classic or the original Edgar Rice Burroughs novels. But in 1995, Italian director Joe D'Amato released a version that definitely wasn't meant for Saturday morning cartoons: Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (also known as Tharzan - La vera storia del figlio della giungla).
This film is a notorious entry in the "adult" or "hardcore" genre, which gained a cult following for its surprisingly high production values compared to its peers. Unlike many low-budget adult films of the 90s, Tarzan-X was shot on location in Kenya and featured striking cinematography that some viewers still find "romantically beautiful". Plot and Production
The story follows the classic Tarzan beats but with an adult twist:
The Meeting: Jane leads an expedition into Africa where she discovers the legendary "Ape Man".
The Adventure: After their initial meeting, Jane attempts to "civilize" Tarzan, eventually bringing him back to Britain where culture shock—and plenty of "jungle passion"—ensues.
The Cast: The film stars the legendary Rocco Siffredi as the Ape Man and Rosa Caracciolo (his real-life wife at the time) as Jane. Why the Notoriety?
Legal Battles: The film achieved minor legal fame when the estate of Edgar Rice Burroughs (the creator of Tarzan) attempted to sue the production for copyright infringement. Unusually, the lawsuit failed, allowing the film to remain in circulation.
Production Quality: Reviewers on sites like IMDb often comment on the film's "Panavision" quality and the natural chemistry between the leads.
The "Shame": Despite the title, viewers often joke that "shame" was the last thing on the characters' minds, given the film's explicit nature. Viewer Warning
If you're looking for a family-friendly jungle adventure, this is not it. While standard reviews for "Tarzan & Jane" content usually suggest an age of 6+, Tarzan-X is strictly for adult audiences due to its explicit content.
Tharzan - La vera storia del figlio della giungla (1995) - IMDb
Tarzan-X: Shame of Jane (1995), directed by Joe D'Amato, is an Italian erotic film and pornographic parody of the classic Tarzan story. It is notable for its high production values, being filmed on location in Kenya, and for starring the real-life couple Rocco Siffredi and Rosa Caracciolo. Film Overview Release Year: 1995 Director: Joe D'Amato
Main Cast: Rocco Siffredi (Tarzan/John), Rosa Caracciolo (Jane), Nikita Gross (Diana) Language: Italian (widely dubbed/subtitled) Genre: Adult/Erotic Plot Summary
The story follows Jane, a sophisticated explorer on an expedition in Africa, who encounters a feral "Ape Man" (Tarzan). Jane decides to civilize him and eventually brings him back to her villa in Britain.
Tharzan - La vera storia del figlio della giungla (1995) - IMDb